Our performance

As a registered social housing landlord, we are required to meet all relevant legislation in the delivery of our housing services. Our Resident Engagement Strategy has a key aim of 'Be Accountable', which ensures that you know how we are performing so you can hold us accountable for how we are delivering our landlord services.  

Our performance measures allow us to have visibility of how we are performing as a housing service, better understand the things that matter to you so we can make improvements to our service.

To help us see how well we are performing, we:

  • carry out an annual Tenant Satisfaction Measures survey as required by the Regulator of Social Housing. This survey helps us to understand through your feedback, how well we are doing providing good quality homes and services and provides you with greater transparency about our performance as your landlord
  • are monitored by the Regulator of Social Housing for our compliance with the Consumer Standards and Rent Standard. More information on the Consumer Standards and the Tenant Satisfaction Measures can be found further down this page
  • visit your neighbourhoods, hold focus groups, and contact you by telephone, email, or letter for your feedback to ensure we are reporting on the things that are important to you
  • undertake transactional surveys on a quarterly basis for new lettings, anti-social behaviour and complaints, with repairs surveys undertaken on a monthly basis
  • we also learn and make changes to our service, based on feedback received from you. To find out more about this, visit our  you said, we did page .

Our performance is shared with Members at the Housing and Wellbeing Committee on a quarterly basis.

Below, you can learn more about our performance measures, view the results, and read the actions we have taken as a result of the feedback you have given us.

Housing services performance booklet

This booklet is updated on a quarterly basis, and shares performance information on our Repairs, ASB, Complaints Handling, Homelessness, Building Safety (Compliance) and Empty Homes (Voids) services.

Read the housing services performance booklet on PageSuite

Regulator of Social Housing – regulatory judgement and grading

About the regulator's judgement 

The Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) is the independent body that ensures councils and housing associations provide safe, good-quality homes and fair services to tenants. In July 2025, RSH carried out an inspection of Arun District Council as part of a national programme. The inspection looked at key areas including safety, repairs, tenant engagement, and transparency.

Following the inspection, the council received a C4 rating (the lowest possible grade) due to serious failings, particularly around safety and overdue repairs. The Regulator concluded that urgent and fundamental changes are needed to improve housing services for tenants. Arun District Council accepts the findings and is now working on a detailed improvement plan to address the issues raised.

The full judgement is available to view here: Arun District Council (45UC) - Regulatory Judgement: 27 August 2025 - GOV.UK

The text of the judgement is also duplicated below

Regulator of Social Housing
Decision: Arun District Council (45UC) - Regulatory Judgement: 27 August 2025 Published 27 August 2025

Our Judgement

Grade/Judgement: C4. Our judgement is that there are very serious failings in the landlord delivering the outcomes of the consumer standards. The landlord must make fundamental changes so that improved outcomes are delivered.

Change: First grading

Date of assessment: August 2025

Reason for publication

We are publishing a regulatory judgement for Arun District Council (Arun DC) following an inspection completed in August 2025.

The regulatory judgement confirms a consumer grade of C4. This is the first time we have issued a consumer grade in relation to this landlord.

Summary of the decision

From the evidence and assurance gained during the inspection, we have concluded that there are failings across all the four consumer standards, and very serious failings in Arun DC delivering the outcomes of the Safety and Quality Standard. Arun DC must make fundamental changes so that improved outcomes are delivered for tenants.

Although Arun DC has indicated a willingness to address these serious failings, we have not yet seen evidence to sufficiently assure us that it understands the potential risks to tenants and of its ability to put matters right, including taking prompt action to gain assurance that tenants are safe. Based on our assessment of the seriousness of the failures and the changes needed to improve outcomes for tenants, we have concluded a C4 grade for Arun DC.

How we reached our judgement

We inspected Arun DC as part of our planned regulatory inspection programme. We considered all four of the consumer standards: Neighbourhood and Community Standard, Safety and Quality Standard, Tenancy Standard, and the Transparency, Influence and Accountability Standard.

During the inspection we observed a Housing and Wellbeing Committee meeting, and a meeting of the Housing for Older People Forum. We met with tenants, officers, the leader of Arun DC and the chair of the Housing and Wellbeing Committee. We also reviewed a wide range of documents provided by Arun DC. 

Our regulatory judgement is based on all the relevant information obtained during the inspection, as well as analysis of information received through routine regulatory returns and other regulatory engagement activity.

Summary of findings

Consumer - C4 - August 2025

We have found serious failings in how Arun DC is delivering the outcomes of the consumer standards, and evidence that this has had a significant impact on service outcomes for tenants. Our judgement is based on the scale and breadth of the issues identified during the inspection and the significant impact or potential impact on Arun DC's tenants. The issues include a failure to meet legal health and safety requirements in relation to fire safety and smoke detection, a lack of accurate information on stock quality, repairs not being completed on time and homes not meeting the Decent Homes Standard (DHS). Arun DC has indicated a willingness to address the issues, however, we have seen limited evidence that it understands and is acting upon urgent concerns around health and safety and has the capability to do so. Fundamental changes are required to the service to improve outcomes for tenants. 

The Safety and Quality Standard requires landlords to identify and meet all legal requirements that relate to the health and safety of tenants in their homes and communal areas and ensure that all actions arising from required health and safety assessments are conducted within appropriate timescales. Through our inspection we found very serious failings in Arun DC delivering this required outcome.

In respect of fire safety, Arun DC could not demonstrate that it is adequately managing and mitigating fire safety risks to tenants. At the time of the inspection, nearly 1,000 fire risk assessment remedial actions were overdue, over 700 of which were categorised as high or very high risk and overdue for more than 12 months. Arun DC self-referred this matter to us at the beginning of the inspection. Arun DC does not have approved plans in place to address the outstanding fire remedial actions and is unable to provide evidence of how it is mitigating fire safety risks. Arun DC also reported that over half of its homes do not have smoke detectors and it does not expect to reach compliance in this area until May 2027.

Alongside the requirements in relation to health and safety, the Safety and Quality Standard also requires Arun DC to provide an effective, efficient and timely repairs and maintenance and planned improvements service for its tenants. At the time of the inspection, Arun DC reported around 2,500 open and overdue repairs cases, of which over 1,500 were overdue by more than three months. Arun DC was unable to provide assurance on the quality and accuracy of the information submitted and acknowledges this area requires significant improvement.

The Safety and Quality Standard also requires landlords to have an accurate, up to date and evidenced understanding of the condition of their homes that reliably informs their provision of good quality, well maintained and safe homes for tenants, and to ensure that their tenants' homes meet the requirements of the DHS. Arun DC has up to date information on the condition of around 75% of its homes but it could not provide us with assurance that all hazards arising from the Housing Health and Safety Rating System assessments undertaken at the time of the surveys had been addressed within appropriate timescales. Arun DC reports that around 10% of its homes are non-decent but given weaknesses in its information, we lack assurance that this figure is accurate.

Taking into account the significance of the issues across a number of health and safety areas, the lack of assurance that Arun DC has appropriate mitigations in place, the failings in the council's repairs and maintenance service and the lack of accurate information, we have concluded that there are very serious failings in Arun DC delivering the outcomes of the Safety and Quality Standard and that it must make fundamental changes so that improved outcomes are delivered for tenants. Arun DC has not yet provided evidence to assure us of its ability to put these matters right. We will work with Arun DC to ensure that any relevant risks to tenants are effectively managed and mitigated as a priority, while it undertakes the improvements required.

The Transparency, Influence and Accountability Standard sets out the outcomes landlords must deliver about being open with tenants and treating them with fairness and respect so that tenants can access services, raise complaints, influence decision making and hold their landlord to account. Through our inspection, we found serious failings in Arun DC delivering the required outcomes in this area. We saw some evidence that tenants are able to participate in tenant-led activities and opportunities, although we found a lack of meaningful opportunities for tenants to scrutinise performance and influence services. Arun DC has limited mechanisms in place to ensure information about its tenants remains up to date, and it did not provide evidence of using the information it does hold to ensure equitable outcomes for tenants.

The Neighbourhood and Community Standard requires landlords to work in partnership with appropriate local authority departments, the police and other relevant organisations to deter and tackle anti-social behaviour (ASB) and hate incidents in the neighbourhoods where they provide social housing. We identified serious failings in Arun DC meeting these outcomes as it failed to provide evidence that it is taking prompt and appropriate action in response to ASB cases and hate incidents.

We also identified serious failings in Arun DC meeting the required outcomes of the Tenancy Standard. Through the inspection, we saw no evidence that Arun DC was offering tenancies or terms of occupation that were compatible with the purpose of its accommodation, the needs of individual households, the sustainability of the community, and the efficient use of its housing stock.

Arun DC has been engaging constructively with us. It understands the issues it needs to address and is taking action to rectify the very serious failures identified. We expect Arun DC to develop a comprehensive plan that will drive fundamental change across all of the areas identified, and to share that with tenants. Our engagement will be intensive, and we will seek assurance that Arun DC is making sufficient change and progress, including ongoing monitoring of how it delivers its improvement programme. Our priority will be that risks to tenants are adequately managed and mitigated. We are not proposing to use our enforcement powers at this stage but will keep this under review as Arun DC seeks to resolve these issues.

Background to the judgement

About the landlord

Arun DC owns around 3,500 social housing homes.

Our role and regulatory approach

We regulate for a viable, efficient, and well governed social housing sector able to deliver quality homes and services for current and future tenants.

We regulate at the landlord level to drive improvement in how landlords operate. By landlord we mean a registered provider of social housing. These can either be local authorities, or private registered providers (other organisations registered with us such as non-profit housing associations, co-operatives, or profit-making organisations).

We set standards which state outcomes that landlords must deliver. The outcomes of our standards include both the required outcomes and specific expectations we set. Where we find there are significant failures in landlords which we consider to be material to the landlord's delivery of those outcomes, we hold them to account. Ultimately this provides protection for tenants' homes and services and achieves better outcomes for current and future tenants. It also contributes to a sustainable sector which can attract strong investment.

We have a different role for regulating local authorities than for other landlords. This is because we have a narrower role for local authorities and the Governance and Financial Viability Standard, and Value for Money Standard do not apply. Further detail on which standards apply to different landlords can be found on our standards page.

We assess the performance of landlords through inspections and by reviewing data that landlords are required to submit to us. In Depth Assessments (IDAs) were one of our previous assessment processes, which are now replaced by our new inspections programme from 1 April 2024. We also respond where there is an issue or a potential issue that may be material to a landlord's delivery of the outcomes of our standards. We publish regulatory judgements that describe our view of landlords' performance with our standards. We also publish grades for landlords with more than 1,000 social housing homes.

The Housing Ombudsman deals with individual complaints. When individual complaints are referred to us, we investigate if we consider that the issue may be material to a landlord's delivery of the outcomes of our standards.

For more information about our approach to regulation, please see Regulating the standards.

Further information

Regulating the standards
Regulatory standards for landlords

Related documents

Decent Homes Standard

Our surveys

Arun Housing Service conducts formal and informal surveys. There are currently 2 types of formal surveys:

  • perception surveys
  • transactional surveys

Both surveys are conducted by a company called Acuity Research and Practice. The information below further explains the differences and purpose for the surveys.

Perception surveys

The perception surveys ask for your overall opinion about the services provided by your landlord, whether you have received any of those services or not.

The perception survey is conducted every quarter, and we combine the quarterly results to give us an annual figure that is submitted to the Regulator of Social Housing as part of our Tenant Satisfaction Measures.

The table below lists the 12 tenant perception measures, with our results from last year and from each quarter so far this year:

Tenant participation measures
Measure
Description
Result 2023/24
Result Q1 2024/25
Result Q2 2024/25
Result Q3 2024/25
Result Q4 2024/25
TP01
Overall satisfaction
58%
61%
61%
59% 62%
TP02
Repairs in last 12 months
58%
74%
73%
67% 66%
TP03
Time taken - last repair
53%
63%
64%
64% 72%
TP04
Well maintained home
55%
69%
60%
58% 66%
TP05
Safe home
59%
73%
76%
70% 79%
TP06
Listens and acts
38%
51%
44%
43% 50%
TP07
Keeps you informed
47%
60%
69%
67% 79%
TP08
Treats fairly and with respect
57%
75%
69%
76% 75%
TP09
Complaints handling
23%
50%
18%
22% 16%
TP10
Communal areas - clean and well maintained
49%
55%
52%
59% 53%
TP11
Positive contribution to the neighbourhood
46%
61%
64%
66% 68%
TP12
Anti-social behaviour
43%
41%
55%
55% 62%

 

Transactional surveys

The transactional surveys ask for your opinion about a service you have received, for example - after a repair has been completed in your home. Acuity conduct 3 transactional surveys on our behalf for:

  • repairs
  • complaints
  • new lettings

The repairs survey takes place every month, whilst the others run quarterly.

We may also run informal surveys throughout the year when we want to ask tenants for their thoughts and opinions in a particular area.  

Read the housing services survey booklet on PageSuite

Our action plan

We have produced a live document that shares all of our targets and how we have been performing against them compared to the previous three months. This is reviewed regularly by the Housing Leadership Team and updated every quarter.

View the action plan

Consumer standards

New standards describe what is expected of social housing landlords, with the objective to protect tenants and improve the service provided by all social housing providers. The consumer standards are:

  • Safety and Quality Standard – Quality of repairs, maintenance and delivering safe homes. 
  • Tenancy Standard – Fair allocation and letting of homes and how tenancies are managed and ended by landlords.
  • Neighbourhood and Community Standard – Engaging with relevant parties so that tenants can live in safe and well-maintained neighbourhoods and feel safe in their homes. 
  • Transparency, Influence and Accountability Standard (including Tenant Satisfaction Measures) – Being open with tenants and treating them with fairness and respect so that tenants can access services, raise complaints, influence decision making and hold their landlord to account.

Tenant satisfaction measures

Further detailed information about the Tenant Satisfaction Measures is available on the government website.

We need to carry out and report the results of this survey every year, so we have commissioned a specialist company called Acuity to do this for us. The survey for the first quarter of 2024 was completed in June.

The second quarterly survey will be carried out in September, with the third in December, before the final survey in March 2025. 

The surveys are strictly confidential, and your responses will be given back to us anonymously, without your name or any other identifying information, unless you give us your permission. 

By allowing us to see your responses, we will have better information to help us improve our services. You will also be asked if you would like us to contact you about any issues you have raised.

In addition to our satisfaction results, we also submit performance indicator data to the Regulator of Social Housing. These are related to Building Safety, ASB, Neighbourhood Management, Complaints and Repairs.

How we spend our income

Residents rightly expect the council to demonstrate strong value for money in managing its housing budget. This includes providing safe, well-maintained, and affordable homes, and high standards of customer service and meaningful tenant engagement.

Meeting these expectations involves maintaining the quality of homes and communal areas, promoting tenant safety and well-being, and ensuring that neighbourhoods remain secure and supportive places to live.

For every £1 in rent and service charge we receive, 36.4% is spent on running housing services, 29.6% goes to financing capital expenditure, 23.5% on repairs and maintenance, and 10.5% on net loan charges. 

This level of transparency reflects our commitment to responsible financial management and ensures residents can see how their contributions support essential services and long-term investment in housing infrastructure.